Freedom versus Order

Table of Contents General Thesis Statement NSA Program Freedom of and Freedom From and Why It Matter Different forms of freedom and NSA Democrats and Republicans and NSA Conclusion Works Cited General Thesis Statement The USA government developed the PRISM program during the presidency of President Bush, apparently to protect Americans from harm. The PRISM was developed from the initial warrantless mass surveillance program. This program was a way of reinforcing the security system within U.S. according to the Congress, but the public sees it differently.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Freedom versus Order specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Regardless of its stated benefits by the government, critics of this program strongly argue that it infringes into people’s privacy and confidentiality, and it is not in line with the ethical principles. This paper therefore seeks to discuss PRISM and its impact on p eople’s lives. NSA Program The NSA is in charge of PRISM, which is a clandestine electronic surveillance program for data collection. This program is used by NSA to get information on raw intelligence for preparing analytical reports. PRISM is considered a move by the U. S government to protect the Americans. The NSA uses the PRISM to monitor communications that are of interest to it. The NSA program works using interceptors called fiber-optic splitters that make copies of data when information is sent through the internet (MacAskill para 4). The NSA’s main objective has not been to gain access into personal information belonging to the civilians. The main challenge however, has been to separate domestic communications from foreign ones to ensure that the agency is not considered a spy (MacAskill para 3-4). The intentions of NSA seem good but at the expense of the Americans because information that is private and confidential is accessed by another party without seekin g consent. The NSA maintains that disclosure of PRISM would ruin the program’s credibility and thereby weaken the security system. Freedom of and Freedom From and Why It Matter Freedom of the surveillance program vis-a-vis freedom from surveillance program sound similar but are very different. The former refers to the wide scope which the surveillance program is applied in the Civilian lives. On the other hand, freedom from this surveillance program means not monitoring the civilians without their consent (Gellman and Laura 1). Freedom of the Americans from mass surveillance is not guaranteed because it is presumed to protect the Americans from terrorists (Granick and Christopher para 5). Privacy is very important in a person’s life, but if it is compromised, freedom of expression is violated. Freedom from legal action was guaranteed to private companies if they collaborated with the government to release information as requested by the Director of National Intelligenc e. Freedom of total reign over one’s communication details is jeopardized by the ability of the U.S to intercept communications.Advertising Looking for essay on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Freedom of the people’s and institutions’ information matters because when this information is accessed by a third-party, some goals may not be achieved. The freedom of the NSA to use the PRISM is deemed necessary because it is a sure way of knowing what foreigners are planning against America; hence, the American government is able to take necessary precautionary measures (Prism para 5-7). Different forms of freedom and NSA The different forms of freedom with reference to PRISM and mining phone metadata include: political freedom, social freedom and personal freedom. Political freedom is where the members of the different parties are free to make their own decisions: a few members of the Democrats and th e Republicans agree with legitimization of the PRISM. The rest are not cognizant of the essence of this legitimization. Agreeing with the legality of the PRISM leads to violation of people’s social freedoms. It becomes difficult to communicate with friends because one thinks that he or she is being watched. In addition, a person’s personal information like chats and photos are easily accessed. On a totally different note, and one that has been ignored by civilians, the monitoring programs guarantees freedom from terrorist attack because they detect suspicious communications. Democrats and Republicans and NSA The New York Times shows that both the Republicans and Democrats make up the Intelligence Committee. A majority of the government watchdogs, mainly consisting of republicans, agrees with the legality of using PRISM and mining metadata from phones. This majority considers this as an action which is legalized by the PATRIOT Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillan ce Court (Chandorkar para 5). While the Democrats’ focus is to preserve the liberty and privacy of the people, the Republicans are critics of Obama’s government. These two parties therefore are meant to act against the freedom of monitoring the private lives of the Americans, but they are divided and cannot achieve much. This gives rise to a weaker voice that cannot succeed in airing the civilians’ grievances. On a different note, Granick and Christopher state that the public was not angered by unauthorized access into its personal communications system as long as Congress had approved this program (para 1). Conclusion The U.S. government is fully convinced that the monitoring program enables it to uncover terrorist plots, but it also interferes with the daily lives of the people. The hacking of people’s emails and phones deprives them of their privacy, which is very important for every person.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Freedo m versus Order specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Freedom from monitoring and freedom of privacy are only enjoyed by civilians if freedom of monitoring and freedom from legal action, in this context, are withdrawn. The use of PRISM is justifiable, but it should strictly adhere to its function, which is to monitor foreign communications. Works Cited Chandorkar, Medha. NSA Prism Program: Obama Spying Scandal Elicits Bipartisan Voices, Pro and Con, 2012. Web. Gellman, Barton and Laura Poitras. â€Å"U.S., British Intelligence Mining Data From Mine U.S. Internet Companies in Broad Secret.† The Washington Post, 7 June 2013. Web. Granick, Jennifer S. and Christopher Jon Sprigman. â€Å"The Criminal N.S.A.† The New York Times, 27 June 2013. Web. MacAskill, Ewen. â€Å"NSA Paid Millions to Cover Prism Compliance Costs for Tech Companies.† The Guardian, 23 August 2013. Web. â€Å"Prism (Surveillance program).† Wikiped ia, 29 August 2013. Web. This essay on Freedom versus Order was written and submitted by user Davian Reed to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Myth and Misconception

Myth and Misconception Myth and Misconception Myth and Misconception By Maeve Maddox Phil Dragonetti writes: One of the things that bug me about English usage is the use of acute word instead of the proper word. One such cute word is myth[which] many use †¦ instead of the word misunderstanding or misconception I received this comment while I was writing a post for my teaching site. The headline Id given my article was The Myth of Make-up Work. Phils comment challenged me to see if I could come up with something else that would convey the same meaning. I changed it to No Such Thing as Make-up Work. The OED gives two general definitions of myth: myth: 1. A traditional story, typically involving supernatural beings or forces, which embodies and provides an explanation, aetiology, or justification for something such as the early history of a society, a religious belief or ritual, or a natural phenomenon.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   2. A widespread but untrue or erroneous story or belief; a widely held misconception; a misrepresentation of the truth. Also: something existing only in myth; a fictitious or imaginary person or thing. Headline writers are not likely to abandon the use of such a useful word as myth: its short, it alliterates with a lot of common words, and it conveys a sense of something that is not true. This use of myth does seem to be applied to just about anything and everything: 10 Big Myths about copyright explained Ten Myths About Affirmative Action Top 10 Myths About Thanksgiving The Myth of Mental Illness The Myth of Alzheimers: What You Arent Being Told James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege All About Digital Photos The Myth of DPI Myths about Pregnancy Myths about Aging Myths about Alcohol When Joseph Campbell called his book The Power of Myth, he wasnt thinking of untrue or erroneous beliefs. He was thinking of universal spiritual truths that shape our lives. Maybe it would make sense to lighten up on the use of myth as a synonym for mere error. Heres a selection of other words and terms that convey the sense of something that is not true, or not completely true: deceit deception delusion error fabrication false notion falsehood fiction flaw half truth illusion inconsistency invention lie misapprehension misconception mistake untruth   Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Misused Words category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:7 English Grammar Rules You Should KnowThat vs. WhichHow to Treat Names of Groups and Organizations

Philosophy Phenomenology and existentialism Sartre on BeinginItself Essay

Philosophy Phenomenology and existentialism Sartre on BeinginItself and BeingforItself - Essay Example His main saying was "Existence precedes Essence". According to Sartre, humans do not have any predetermined nature or course that they should follow. They can decide to do anything that is valuable to them. They have free choice and independent action. The human nature is shaped through these free choices and values. According to the Existentialist view, we create our own nature through our actions, desires, decisions, plans and ambitions. His above slogan negates the traditional view where essence comes before existence and this is the centre of the conventional argument that human beings are born pre-endowed with a nature of their own. According to the pre-determined nature, the individual's chances, opportunities, values, concept in life and achievements are all pre-determined and he will accept life according to the predetermined nature guided by his characters and nature. There is very little he can do about it and alter neither the own nature nor the course it is taking. But Sartre argues against all of it. So, according to his Existentialism it is all in the hands of Man and his likes and dislikes that makes life's rulings. His arguments on being-in-itself and being-for-itself are grounded on this basic assumption. "I suppose that it is accurate to say loosely that being in itself is nonconscious being and that being-for-itself is conscious being. And, at least pragmatically, we may as well restrict being-for-i tself to human being," says Howells (1992, p.49). He says that the external world is connected to the state of being-in-itself and it is a way of existence, an unconscious one, neither passive, nor active, and has no capacity of transcendence. According to Sartre humans like to play God and have a compulsive desire to reach the status of being-in-itself, which means, an ardent longing to be the master of one's own destiny, to be identified in a gratifying way, and attain complete control over his own and other's existence. The difference between the two states is shown in the most simplistic way possible by Sartre. His famous example of a waiter is very interesting. A waiter in the caf thinks that he is a born waiter and nothing else. He thinks that the caf cannot work without him and he is the epitome of perfection in his job. But Sartre says that this cannot be so. He says a man cannot be a complete waiter the way an inkwell is an inkwell. This means, inkwell cannot be anything else other than inkwell, while the man can be many more things other than being a waiter. If he loses the job, or if he gets some other opportunity, he will be come a policeman, or a shopkeeper or a lawyer, or anything else. He could get into any other identity, many of them, one of which is being a waiter because a human being is constantly creating and recreating himself and adapting himself to any role that becomes a necessity of the moment. As inkwell is inkwell, the man is a man. The difference is man can adapt himself to many more identities; but he still continues to be a man which is the state of being-for-itself. In the state of being for itself, he does not ha ve any fixed nature or essence. Actually he should focus more on being for itself instead of being in itself, and he commits this error constantly. While doing so, he becomes a